Author:
Connor Denise M.,Dhaliwal Gurpreet
Abstract
Abstract
Busy clinician-educators are often tasked with remediating medical students who have deficits in clinical reasoning. In this essay, we share our early experience with providing less feedback and more practice to these trainees. We suggest that front line teachers can streamline their feedback to struggling reasoners by focusing solely on the problem representation and prioritized differential diagnosis of the main problem in their oral presentations and then engaging in repeated loops of feedback until the student achieves competency in real time. By receiving feedback targeted to the assessment alone and employing deliberate practice, struggling students have the opportunity to make concrete improvement during short-term clinical assignments. This remediation approach is feasible for busy clinician-educators and warrants formal study.
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference11 articles.
1. Audetat MC, Dory V, Nendaz M, Vanpee D, Pestiaux D, Junod Perron N, et al. What is so difficult about managing clinical reasoning difficulties? Med Educ 2012;46:216–227.
2. Kalet A, Chou CL. Remediation in medical education: a mid-course correction. New York: Springer, 2014.
3. Stuart E, Slavin S, Blankenburg R, Butani L, Konopasek L. Clinical reasoning. In: Morgenstern B, editor. Guidebook for clerkship directors, 4th ed. Syracuse, New York: Gegensatz Press, 2012.
4. Guerrasio J, Aagaard EM. Methods and outcomes for the remediation of clinical reasoning. J Gen Intern Med 2014;29:1607–14.
5. Dhaliwal G. Capsule commentary on Guerrasio and Aagaard, methods and outcomes for the remediation of clinical reasoning. J Gen Intern Med 2014;29:1687.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献