Cross-Cultural Variation in the Use of Hedges and Boosters in Academic Discourse

Author:

Dontcheva-Navratilova Olga1

Affiliation:

1. English Linguistics at the Faculty of Education, Masaryk University in Brno, Czech Republic

Abstract

Abstract Hedges and boosters are important metadiscoursal devices contributing to the construal of persuasion in academic discourse as they enable academic writers to distinguish facts from opinions, evaluate the views of others and convey a different degree of commitment to their assertions (cf. Hyland 1998a, Hyland 2004, 2005). This study explores cross-cultural variation in the use of lexical hedges and boosters in the academic discourse of non-native writers. The study is carried out on a specialized corpus of linguistics research articles published in the international journal Applied Linguistics and the national Czech English-medium journal Discourse and Interaction. The main purpose of the cross-cultural investigation is to analyze variation in the rate, distribution and choice of hedges and boosters across the rhetorical structure of research articles in order to shed light on ways in which Anglophone and Czech writers express different degrees of commitment in their assertions when striving to persuade their target readership to accept their views and claims.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference47 articles.

1. Abdollahzadeh, Esmaeel. “Poring over the findings: Interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (2011): 288-297. Print.

2. Bhatia, Vijay K. Worlds of Written Discourse. A Genre-Based View. New York: Continuum, 2004. Print.

3. Brown, Peneloppe and Stephen Levinson. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. Print.

4. Clemen, Gudrun. “The concept of hedging: Origins, approaches and definitions.” Eds. Raija Markkanen and Hartmut Schroder. Hedging and Discourse. Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1997. 235-248. Print.

5. Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga. “Authorial presence in academic discourse: Functions of author-reference pronouns.” Linguistica Pragensia 23/1 (2013a), 9-30. Print.

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3