Potentializing physical violenceHistorical Sociology of Polizei and Sozialstaat from a system theoretical perspective

Author:

Sakai Kosuke1

Affiliation:

1. The University of Tokyo Department of Advanced Social and International Studies Tokyo Japan

Abstract

Abstract Violence as a means of threatening the life and health of others is the foundation of power structures. According to a system theoretical understanding, however, physical violence becomes the basis for the power medium only when it is potentialized as a possibility for the political system. This potential threat contributes to the exodus of the political system through the formation of political organizations. This paper examines this hypothesis about violence and the political system from a historical, sociological perspective. I analyzed semantically the significance of Polizei, whose scope is said to have been limited from various governance practices, including welfare to the maintenance of security since the 19th century, in the development of labor protection policy, which was a precondition for the formation of the modern German welfare state. On the one hand, the work of the police in social policy was clearly distinguished from welfare on the level of political semantics; on the other hand, the appearance of other professionals made it possible for the police to continue to be involved in a wide range of social policy. These empirical findings show that the semantic differentiation of the political system with the potentialization of violence does not mean irrelevance and indifference to the environment; rather, it expands the scope of interest and makes it possible to relate to a more diverse range of subjects.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Medicine

Reference58 articles.

1. Baecker, Dirk (1996): Gewalt im System. Soziale Welt 47, 92–109.

2. Becker, Frank (ed.) (2004): Geschichte und Systemtheorie. Exemplarische Fallstudien. Frankfurt a.M./New York: Campus.

3. Breuer, Stefan (1986): Sozialdisziplinierung. Probleme und Problemverlagerungen eines Konzepts bei Max Weber, Gerhard Oestreich und Michel Foucault, in: Christoph Sachße/Florian Tennstedt (eds.), Soziale Sicherheit und soziale Disziplinierung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 45–69.

4. Chapman, Brian (1970): Police State. London: Macmillan Education.

5. Evans, Richard J./Etges, Andreas (1996): Polizei, Politik und Gesellschaft in Deutschland 1700–1933. Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 22(4), 609–628.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3