Advice as a Form of Structural Coupling: Intersystem Organizations and Scientific Communication in the Japanese Response to COVID-19

Author:

Sakai Kosuke

Abstract

AbstractA critical issue in the study of scientific communication from a systems theoretical perspective is its role in multiple intersystem relationships. During COVID-19, politics has adopted scientific findings to inform political decisions. However, science has in response actively coordinated its operations for providing desired stimuli to politics. Luhmann identified advice as a form of structural coupling that links political and scientific systems. Advice is not a monolithic intervention by which one side acts on the other but is rather an interface that enables the two systems to relate through distancing. In this article, I empirically illustrate how the structural coupling of the political system and scientific system through advice manifests itself in an examination of the roles that various organizations (expert meeting and cluster task forces) have played in Japan’s response to COVID-19. Through this analysis, I provide a theoretical insight regarding these organizations and a more detailed case analysis of the transformation of certain organizations to re-describe the system theoretical insights of advice in the form of scientific communication between politics and science.

Funder

The University of Tokyo

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management

Reference28 articles.

1. Adachi Y, Sugitani K (2020) What challenges does the COVID-19 pandemic crisis impose on public policy studies as a trans-discipline? J Public Policy Stud 20:76–86 (Japanese)

2. Asia Pacific Initiative (API) (2020) Special committee for private-sector investigation of the novel coronavirus: investigation and verification report. Discover 21. (Japanese)

3. Bogenschneider K, Corbett T (2021) Evidence-based policymaking: envisioning a new era of theory, research, and practice, 2nd edn. Routledge, UK

4. Brown MB (2015) Politicizing science: conceptions of politics in science and technology studies. Soc Stud Sci 45(1):3–30

5. Cairney P (2016) The politics of evidence-based policy making. Palgrave Macmillan, London

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3