Author:
Młyniec Agnieszka,Bednarek Hanna
Abstract
Abstract
This study examined cognitive predictors of susceptibility to orientation illusions: Poggendorff, Ponzo, and Zöllner. It was assumed that lower efficiency of information processing in WM and higher field dependence are conducive to orientation illusions. 61 architects (30 women) aged M = 29, +/- 1.6, and 49 university students (29 women) aged M = 23.53, +/- 4.24, were tested with Witkin’s EFT to assess their field dependence; the SWATT method was used as a measure of WM efficiency, and susceptibility to visual illusions was verified with a series of computer tasks. We obtained a small range of the explained variance in the regression models including FDI and WM indicators. On the basis of WM efficiency indicators, we managed to confirm the existence of memory predictors of susceptibility to illusions (they are rather weak, as they explain from 6% to 14% of the variance of the dependent variable). Among the architects, lower efficiency of WM processing (weaker inhibition, task-switching) and higher field dependence are responsible for greater susceptibility to orientation illusions.
Reference92 articles.
1. Attentional control settings modulate susceptibility to the induced Roeloffs effect Attention;Lester;Perception Psychophysics,2011
2. percepcyjne czy percepcje normalne powstawania iluzji percepcyjnych red a rzeczywistość studia z fi lozofi i humanistyki;Króliczak,1999
3. The Hidden Patterns Test In Educational Testing Service Princeton;Ekstrom,1976
4. a Studies in space orientation : III of the upright in the absence of a visual field of;Witkin;Perception Journal Experimental Psychology,1948
5. Orientation illusions vary in size and direction as a function of task - dependant attention;Daini;Perception Psychophysics,2008
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献