Can cognitive structure outcomes reveal cognitive styles? A study on the relationship between cognitive styles and cognitive structure outcomes on the subject of chemical kinetics

Author:

Atabek-Yigit Elif1234ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Science Education

2. Sakarya University

3. Sakarya

4. Turkey

Abstract

Determination of the relationship between individuals’ cognitive styles and cognitive structure outcomes was the main aim of this study. Sixty-six participants were enrolled in the study and their cognitive styles were determined by using the Hidden Figure Test (for their field dependent/independent dimension of cognitive style) and the Convergent/Divergent Test (for their convergence/divergence dimension of cognitive style). An open-ended questionnaire was formed in order to determine participants’ cognitive structure outcomes. The study topic was chosen as chemical kinetics since it is one of the most difficult topics in chemistry according to many students and also there is limited study in the literature on this topic. Key concepts about chemical kinetics were selected and given to the participants and they were asked to write a text by using the given concepts. A flow map technique was used to reveal participants’ cognitive structure outcomes. According to the findings of this study, it can be said that field independent participants tended to be divergent thinkers while field dependents tended to be convergent thinkers. Also, strong positive relationships between participants’ field dependency/independency and some cognitive structure outcomes (extent and richness) were found. That is, field independents tended to have more extended and richer cognitive structure outcomes. However, the convergence/divergence dimension of cognitive style did not show any correlation with cognitive structure outcomes.

Publisher

Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

Subject

Education,Chemistry (miscellaneous)

Reference33 articles.

1. Alamolhodaei H., (1996), A study in higher education calculus and students’ learning styles , Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Scotland: University of Glasgow

2. Al-Naeme F. F. A., (1991), The influence of various learning styles on practical problem-solving in chemistry in Scottish secondary schools , Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Scotland: University of Glasgow

3. Al-Naeme F. and Johnstone A., (1991), Room for scientific thought? Int. J. Sci. Educ. , 13 , 187–192

4. Anderson O. R., Randle D., and Covotsos T., (2001), The role of ideational networks in laboratory inquiry learning and knowledge of evolution among seventh-grade students, Sci. Educ. , 85 (4), 410–425

5. Atabek-Yigit E., (2015), Exploring the relationship between cognitive structure outcomes and test achievements of pre-service science teachers on chemical bonding via flow mapping, J. Balt. Sci. Educ. , 14 (4), 524–534

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3