Affiliation:
1. Department of Theory and Philosophy of Law , Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University , Pushkinska 77, Kharkiv 61024, Ukraine
Abstract
Abstract
The article focuses on the right to be forgotten, which is at the center of changes in the concept of human rights in the digital age. The origins of the right to be forgotten in European legal doctrine and judicial practice, as well as its relationship with autonomy and identity, are analyzed. The article also examines the significance of the new understanding of “time” and “data” for the adoption of this right, considering the influence of two key cases of the Court of Justice of the European Union, such as Google v. Spain [2014] and Google v. CNIL [2019] on the concept of the right to be forgotten. The place of this right, its connection with privacy and European data protection law is debated. The article focuses on jurisdictional issues, paying particular attention to both the right to be forgotten and the understanding of the relationship between privacy a nd freedom of expression in the European Union and the United States, and possible jurisdictional disputes around the world. The article also addresses the issue of balancing rights and legitimate interests, as well as the proportionality for applying the right to be forgotten, both in the European and global contexts.
Reference41 articles.
1. Ambrose, M. L. (2013), ‘It’s about time: privacy, information lifecycles, and the right to be forgotten,’ Stanford Technology Law Review, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 369–422.
2. Andrade, N. N. G. (2014), ‘Oblivion: the right to be different … from oneself: re-proposing the right to be forgotten,’ in A. Ghezzi, Â. G. Pereira & L. Vesnić-Alujević (eds) The Ethics of Memory in a Digital Age, Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137428455_5
3. Ausloos, J. (2012), ‘The ‘right to be forgotten’ – worth remembering?’ Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2012.01.006
4. Bartolini, C. & Siry, L. (2016), ‘The right to be forgotten in the light of the consent of the data subject,’ Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 218–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2016.01.005
5. Bennett, S. C. (2012), ‘The “right to be forgotten”: reconciling EU and US perspectives,’ Berkeley Journal of International Law, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 161–195. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38V08Z
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献