How Dark Is It? An Investigation of Dark Money Operations in U.S. Nonprofit Political Advocacy Organizations

Author:

Irvin Renée A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Planning, Public Policy & Management , University of Oregon , 1408 University Street , Eugene , OR , 97403-1299 , USA

Abstract

Abstract Claims of dark money influence on U.S. political activity are heard from both left- and right-leaning media, both accusing the other side of undue influence from high net worth political donors on American politics. This article explores the issues of donor control, transparency, and publicness of economic policy advocacy organizations. The study focuses on social welfare nonprofit organizations active in economic policy advocacy, utilizing tax filings to compose an index of transparency based on observed characteristics such as; website verbiage, board size, staffing, fundraising spending, relations to other organizations, and other indicators. All of these variables measure legal behavior, yet as L.H. Mayer describes, some organizations appear to be stretching the boundaries of the rules so egregiously as to be in violation of legal rules, with “little fear of negative consequences” (2018, 194). Organizational tactics can reflect a disinterest in public engagement, or worse, a deliberate attempt to keep the organization’s operations opaque. It is impossible to observe, with current policy, the identity of the donors. Given an index as proposed in this article, however, observers can rank organizations on a scale indicating transparent or opaque characteristics.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Public Administration,Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science

Reference69 articles.

1. Abelson, D. E. 2016. “It Seemed like a Good Idea at the Time: Reflections on the Evolution of the American Think Tanks.” Canadian Review of American Studies 46 (1): 139–57. https://doi.org/10.3138/cras.2014.015.

2. Åberg, P., S. Einarsson, and M. Reuter. 2019. “Think Tanks: New Organizational Actors in a Changing Swedish Civil Society.” Voluntas. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00174-9.

3. Advocacy, B. 2018. Election Year Activities for 501(c)(4) Social Welfare Organizations. https://bolderadvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Election_Year_Activities_for_501c4_Social_Welfare_Organizations.pdf (accessed January 1, 2023).

4. Andrews, K. T., and B. Edwards. 2004. “Advocacy Organizations in the U.S. Political Process.” Annual Review of Sociology 30: 479–506. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110542.

5. Aprill, E. P. 2018. “Examining the Landscape of Section 501(c)(4) Social Welfare Organizations.” NYU Journal of Legislation & Public Policy 21: 345–411.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3