Abstract
AbstractPolicy institutes, or “think tanks”, are becoming increasingly ubiquitous in our societies. In this article, we conceptualize think tanks explicitly as a civil society phenomenon, linking the proliferation of this relatively new type of actor to the transformation of civil society structures and of systems of interest representation. Using the case of Sweden as an illustration, we argue that the recent decades’ rise of think tanks in institutional settings outside of the USA can only be understood if we take into account the particular features and institutional policy access opportunities of the domestic civil society in each national case, and that think tanks should be analytically understood as the allies of, rather than competitors to, the older, established forces in civil society.
Funder
Ragnar Söderbergs stiftelse
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Strategy and Management,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Business and International Management
Reference70 articles.
1. Åberg, P. (2015). Myths and traditions as constraints or resources? Path dependency and decoupling strategies among civil society organizations. Journal of Civil Society, 11(1), 19–38.
2. Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. London: Sage.
3. Berry, J. M. (1989). The interest group society. Ill: Glenview.
4. Bertelli, A. M., & Wenger, J. B. (2009). Demanding information: Think tanks and the US congress. British Journal of Political Science, 39, 225–242.
5. Blach-Orsten, M., & Kristensen, N. N. (2016). Think tanks in Denmark—media visibility and network relations. Politik, 19(1), 22–42.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献