Minimally invasive <i>in situ</i> bioprinting using tube-based material transfer-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Minimally invasive in situ bioprinting using tube-based material transfer

Published:2023-07-01 Issue:7 Volume:71 Page:562-571
ISSN:0178-2312
Container-title:at - Automatisierungstechnik
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Tomooka Yukiko¹,Spothelfer Dominic¹,Puiggali-Jou Anna²,Tourbier Céline³⁴,Tankus Esma Bahar³⁴,Thieringer Florian M.³⁴,Cattin Philippe C.⁵,Rauter Georg¹,Eugster Manuela¹

Affiliation:

1. BIROMED-Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering , University of Basel , Basel , Switzerland

2. Tissue Engineering and Biofabrication Lab, Department of Health Science and Technology , ETH Zürich , Zürich , Switzerland

3. Clinic of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery , University Hospital Basel , Basel , Switzerland

4. Swiss MAM Research Group, Department of Biomedical Engineering , University of Basel , Basel , Switzerland

5. CIAN, Department of Biomedical Engineering , University of Basel , Basel , Switzerland

Abstract

Abstract Minimally invasive in situ bioprinting can potentially enhance the advantages of bioprinting, allowing the surrounding healthy tissue to be maximally preserved. However, the requirements for such a device are manifold and challenging to fulfill. We present an experimental bioprinting platform consisting of an extrusion system based on a tube mounted between an extrusion syringe and a dispensing nozzle. We investigated the influence of material transfer through a tube on the printing outcome. The results showed that it is feasible to form a continuous filament and print 3-dimensional structures using the developed platform.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Computer Science Applications,Control and Systems Engineering

Link

https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/auto-2023-0060/pdf

Reference30 articles.

1. S. Santoni, S. G. Gugliandolo, M. Sponchioni, D. Moscatelli, and B. M. Colosimo, “3D bioprinting: current status and trends—a guide to the literature and industrial practice,” Bio-Des. Manuf., vol. 5, pp. 14–42, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-021-00165-0.

2. A. MacAdam, E. Chaudry, C. D. McTiernan, D. Cortes, E. J. Suuronen, and E. I. Alarcon, “Development of in situ bioprinting: a mini review,” Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., vol. 10, p. 940896, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.940896.

3. S. Singh, D. Choudhury, F. Yu, V. Mironov, and M. W. Naing, “In situ bioprinting – bioprinting from benchside to bedside?” Tech. Rep. improvements., 2020.

4. F. Picard, A. Deakin, N. Balasubramanian, and A. Gregori, “Minimally invasive total knee replacement: techniques and results,” Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 781–791, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2164-4.

5. M. Eugster, J.-P. Merlet, N. Gerig, P. C. Cattin, and G. Rauter, “Miniature parallel robot with submillimeter positioning accuracy for minimally invasive laser osteotomy,” Robotica, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1070–1097, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0263574721000990.