Fear and Loathing: Undergraduate Nursing Students’ Experiences of a Mandatory Course in Applied Statistics

Author:

Hagen Brad1,Awosoga Oluwagbohunmi A.1,Kellett Peter1,Damgaard Marie1

Affiliation:

1. 1University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada

Abstract

AbstractThis article describes the results of a qualitative research study evaluating nursing students’ experiences of a mandatory course in applied statistics, and the perceived effectiveness of teaching methods implemented during the course. Fifteen nursing students in the third year of a four-year baccalaureate program in nursing participated in focus groups before and after taking the mandatory course in statistics. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using content analysis to reveal four major themes: (i) “one of those courses you throw out?,” (ii) “numbers and terrifying equations,” (iii) “first aid for statistics casualties,” and (iv) “re-thinking curriculum.” Overall, the data revealed that although nursing students initially enter statistics courses with considerable skepticism, fear, and anxiety, there are a number of concrete actions statistics instructors can take to reduce student fear and increase the perceived relevance of courses in statistics.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Education,General Nursing

Reference42 articles.

1. Reform-oriented teaching of introductory statistics in the health, social and behavioral sciences: Historical context and rationale;Hassad;International Journal of Human and Social Sciences,2009

2. Educating for evidence based practice;Ciliska;Journal of Professional Nursing,2005

3. Statistical education: Improvements are badly needed;Hogg;The American Statistician,1991

4. Evidence-based nursing education: Myth or reality?;Ferguson;Journal of Nursing Education,2005

5. Strategies for teaching nursing research: Strategies for including statistical concepts in a course in research methodology for baccalaureate nursing students;Johnson;Western Journal of Nursing Research,1984

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3