Affiliation:
1. School of Humanities , Coventry University , Coventry , UK
Abstract
Abstract
Since the outbreak of the war in the Ukraine, realism has made a comeback in public discourses but it is not clear what realism actually means as it seems to stand for everything: from supporting the Ukraine against Russian aggression to the war is the West’s fault. This is the result of decades of not distinguishing between neorealism and classical realism and implicitly acknowledging neorealist storytelling of having systematized classical realist thought. The present paper is a further intervention to carefully distinguish between both theoretical perspectives to uncover what they can add to current world political problems. It finishes by asking if neorealist scholars like John Mearsheimer have a point that it is the West’s fault and a diplomatic solution needs to be found. They often refer to Hans Morgenthau not least because he was one of the most outspoken critics of the Vietnam War.
Subject
Philosophy,Sociology and Political Science
Reference62 articles.
1. Althaus, P. 2022. “Sicherheitsexperte: ‘Deutschlands Angst vor einem Atomkrieg ist eine Ausrede’.” In Berliner Zeitung.
2. Bain, W. 2000. “Deconfusing Morgenthau: Moral Inquiry and Classical Realism Reconsidered.” Review of International Studies 26 (3): 445–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210500004459.
3. Behr, H., and A. Heath. 2009. “Misreading in IR Theory and Ideology Critique: Morgenthau, Waltz, and Neo-Realism.” Review of International Studies 35 (2): 327–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210509008547.
4. Behr, H., and X. Kirke. 2014. “The Tale of a ‘Realism’ in International Relations.” In E-International Relations.
5. Bell, D., ed. 2009. Political Thought and International Relations: Variations on a Realist Theme. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献