Affiliation:
1. Department of Civil and Geomatics Engineering, California State University, Fresno, 2320 E. San Ramon Avenue M/S EE94, CA, 93740, USA
Abstract
AbstractPost Processed Static (PPS) and Precise Point Positioning (PPP) techniques are not new; however, they have been refined over the decades. As such, today these techniques are offered online via GPS (Global Positioning System) data processing services. In this study, one Post Processed Static (OPUS) and one Precise Point Positioning (CSRS-PPP) technique is used to process 24 h GPS data for a CORS (Continuously Operating Reference Stations) station (P565) duration of year 2016. By analyzing the results sent by these two online services, subsidence is determined for the location of CORS station, P565, as 3–4 cm for the entire year of 2016. In addition, precision of these two techniques is determined as ∼2 cm. Accuracy of PPS and PPP results is 0.46 cm and 1.21 cm, respectively. Additionally, these two techniques are compared and variations between them is determined as 2.5 cm.
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Engineering (miscellaneous),Modelling and Simulation
Reference32 articles.
1. Static and kinematic PPP using online services: a case study in Florida;Journal of Spatial Science,2017
2. How well can online GPS PPP post-processing services be used to establish geodetic survey control networks?;Journal of Applied Geodesy,2008
3. A performance evaluation of the internet based static GPS computation services;Survey Review,2007
4. How precise is OPUS? Part I: Experimental results;The American Surveyor,2011
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献