A review of some nonexplosive alternative methods to conventional rock blasting

Author:

Al-Bakri Ali1,Hefni Mohammed1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mining Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Abdulaziz University (KAU) , Jeddah , Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Abstract The conventional blasting rock excavation method is the main means of rock breakage because of its high productivity, and it is relatively inexpensive compared to other methods. However, it raises safety concerns and can negatively impact the environment. The major disturbances that may be induced by this method include flyrock, gas emissions, and vibrations. This review discusses some nonexplosive rock breakage methods, particularly the hydraulic splitter and expansive chemical agents, that can be employed instead of the conventional blasting method and analyzes their potential effectiveness in rock breakage. Hydraulic splitting machines and expansive chemical agents were studied in the context of the literature. This review showed that hard rock breaking can be executed effectively and safely using alternative methods, which have a wide range of advantages, including safe operation, ease of use, and environmental friendliness, over conventional explosive methods. Moreover, as modern nonexplosive methods, hydraulic splitting machines and expansive chemical agents can generate pressure of up to 43 and 30–44 MPa to induce stresses in rocks, respectively. Owing to safety and environmental restrictions on conventional blasting, the application scope of the modern methods can be increased in the future.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,Environmental Science (miscellaneous)

Reference73 articles.

1. Res J, Wladzielczyk K, Ghose A. Environment-friendly techniques of rock breaking. 1st edn. United States: CRC Press; 2003.

2. Babaeian M, Ataei M, Sereshki F, Sotoudeh F, Mohammadi S. A new framework for evaluation of rock fragmentation in open pit mines. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng. 2019;11(2):325–36. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.11.006.

3. Kanchibotla SS, Morrell S, Valery W, Loughlin PO. Exploring the effect of blast design on SAG mill throughput at KCGM. Proc mine to mill conf, Brisbane; 1998. p. 1–16, [Online]. Available: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Exploring+the+effect+of+blast+design+on+SAG+mill+throughput+at+KCGM&btnG=

4. De Silva RV, Gamage RP, Anne Perera MS. An alternative to conventional rock fragmentation methods using SCDA: a review. Energies. 2016;9:11. 10.3390/en9110958.

5. Caldwell T. A comparison of non-explosive rock breaking techniques. Proceedings of materials science; 2005. p. 1–7, [Online]. Available: http://www.ats.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/2005-Tina_Caldwell.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3