Exploring lexical bundles in low proficiency level L2 learners’ English writing: an ETS corpus study

Author:

Li Mo1ORCID,Zhang Xiaotian2ORCID,Reynolds Barry Lee34ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Education, University of Macau, Room 2052, FED Building (E33), Avenida da Universidade , Taipa , Macau SAR , China

2. Faculty of Education, University of Macau, Room 3050, FED Building (E33), Avenida da Universidade , Taipa , Macau SAR , China

3. Faculty of Education, University of Macau, Room 1017, FED Building (E33), Avenida da Universidade , Taipa , Macau SAR , China

4. Centre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, University of Macau , Taipa , Macau SAR , China

Abstract

Abstract The use of formulaic language in written discourse is an important indicator of language competence. Nonetheless, the features of lexical bundles used by lower proficiency English as a Foreign Language learners have received little attention. The present study addressed this gap by employing a corpus-based method to investigate the quantity, function, and quality of four-word lexical bundles produced by low proficiency L2 English writers with 11 different L1 backgrounds in response to a timed English writing assessment. The investigation was specifically anchored on the data extracted from 1,330 essays using Wordsmith 7.0. Results of the investigation showed (1) an over dependence on writing topic related bundles; (2) an Indo-European L1 language background positively influencing lexical bundle production; (3) an overuse of stance expressions and discourse organizers at the expense of referential expression usage; (4) L1 Japanese, Korean, and Telugu writers producing more accurate lexical bundles and L1 German writers producing fewer accurate lexical bundles; and (5) the frequent use of lexical bundles not leading to highly accurate and appropriate use of lexical bundles. The implications of these results were discussed in connection with foreign language education.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference54 articles.

1. Ädel, Annelie & Britt Erman. 2012. Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach. English for Specific Purposes 31(2). 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.004.

2. Allen, David. 2009. Lexical bundles in learner writing: An analysis of formulaic language in the ALESS learner corpus. Komaba Journal of English Education 1. 105–127.

3. Beekes, Robert. 2011. Comparative Indo-European linguistics: an introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

4. Biber, Douglas. 2004. Lexical bundles in academic speech and writing. In B. Lewandowska- Tomaszczyk (ed.), Practical Applications in Language and Computers, 165–178. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

5. Biber, Douglas. 2006. University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers, vol. 23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3