To copy verbatim, paraphrase or summarize – listeners’ methods of discourse representation while recalling academic lectures

Author:

Wang Haiping1ORCID,Yu Guoxing2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Foreign Studies , 12671 East China University of Political Science and Law , Shanghai , China

2. School of Education , 1980 University of Bristol , Bristol , UK

Abstract

Abstract It is unanimously agreed that comprehension of academic lectures is cognitively demanding; however, few studies have focused on a listener’s real-time discourse representation of a lecture. Based on the qualitative analysis of the verbal protocols, the present study investigated sixteen Chinese university students’ verbal recall of an academic mini-lecture to explore how they made sense of the lecture and represented its discourse when they recalled it episode by episode, and to what extent they differed in discourse representation. The results show that listeners’ discourse representation involved a range of cognitive processes such as paraphrasing, summarizing, and verbatim copying. Paraphrasing and summarizing were the main methods of discourse representation used by the participants when they verbally recalled the lecture. Those who correctly paraphrased more idea units recalled more content of the lecture. They were able to select and retain more idea units in their short-term memory, build more associations between the selected idea units, integrate them with the existing discourse structures and ensure contextual coherence in the construction of the local discourse structures. The findings of the study contribute to a better understanding of how listeners comprehend academic lectures and confirm that improving students’ paraphrasing skills and hierarchical discourse construction in recall are conducive to better comprehension of academic lectures.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference65 articles.

1. Alderson, John Charles. 2000. Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

2. Allison, Desmond & Steve Tauroza. 1995. The effect of discourse organization on lecture comprehension. English for Specific Purposes 14(2). 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(95)00007-e.

3. Anderson, John Robert. 1976. Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

4. Anderson, John Robert. 2014. Cognitive psychology and its implications, 8th edn. New York: Worth.

5. Baddeley, Alan D. 1986. Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3