Affiliation:
1. Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History , Kahlaische Straße 10 , Jena 07745 , Germany
2. Leipzig University (IPF 141199) , Nikolaistraße 6-10 , Leipzig 04109 , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
This paper gives an overview of differential place marking phenomena and formulates a number of universals that seem to be well supported. Differential place marking is a situation in which the coding of locative, allative or ablative roles depends on subclasses of nouns, in particular place names (toponyms), inanimate common nouns and human nouns. When languages show asymmetric coding differences depending on such subclasses, they show shorter (and often zero) coding of place roles with toponyms, and longer (often adpositional rather than affixal) coding of place roles with human nouns. Like differential object marking, differential place marking can be explained by frequency asymmetries, expectations derived from frequencies, and the general preference for efficient coding. I also argue that differential place marking patterns provide an argument against the need to appeal to ambiguity avoidance to explain differential object marking.
Reference39 articles.
1. Aissen, Judith. 2003. Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21(3). 435–483.
2. Aristar, Anthony Rodrigues. 1997. Marking and hierarchy types and the grammaticalization of case-markers. Studies in Language 21(2). 313–368.
3. Bentley, Mayrene. 1998. The marking of grammatical relations in Swahili. Studies in African Linguistics 27(2). 177–197.
4. Bhatia, Tej K. 1993. Punjabi: A cognitive-descriptive grammar. New York: Routledge.
5. Chechuro, Ilya. 2019. Nominal morphology of Mehweb. In Michael Daniel, Nina Dobrushina & Dmitry Ganenkov (eds.), Topics in the grammar of Mehweb, 39–73. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献