Affiliation:
1. Department of Philosophy, Communication and Performing Arts University of Rome, ‘Roma TRE’, Italy
Abstract
Abstract
In this paper I concentrate on Euclidean diagrams, namely on those diagrams that are licensed by the rules of Euclid’s plane geometry. I shall overview some philosophical stances that have recently been proposed in philosophy of mathematics to account for the role of such diagrams in mathematics, and more particularly in Euclid’s Elements. Furthermore, I shall provide an original analysis of the epistemic role that Euclidean diagrams may (and, indeed) have in empirical sciences, more specifically in physics. I shall claim that, although the world we live in is not Euclidean, Euclidean diagrams permit to obtain knowledge of the world through a specific mechanism of inference I shall call inheritance.
Reference28 articles.
1. Avigad, J., Dean, E., and Mumma, J., 2009, A formal system for Euclid’s elements. Review of Symbolic Logic, 2 (4):700-768.
2. Barwise, J. and Etchemendy, J., 1996, Visual information and valid reasoning. In Allwein, G. and Barwise, J. (eds.), Logical Reasoning with Diagrams, New York (USA): Oxford University Press, pp. 3-25.
3. Brown, J. R., 1999, Philosophy of Mathematics: an Introduction to the World of Proofs and Pictures. London: Routledge.
4. Bueno, O. and Colyvan, M., 2011, An inferential conception of the application of mathematics. Noûs, 45 (2): 345-374.
5. De Risi, V., 2016, Leibniz on the Parallel Postulate and the Foundations of Geometry. Basel: Birkhäuser.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献