Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy, reasons for interrupting treatment: a systematic review of the literature
Author:
Ezanno Anne-Cecile1ORCID, Malgras Brice12, Pocard Marc34ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of digestive surgery , Begin Military Teaching Hospital , Saint Mandé , France 2. French Military health Service Academy, Ecole du Val de Grâce , Paris , France 3. Department of digestive surgery , La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital , Paris , France 4. INSERM , U965 Cart unit , Paris , France
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) gives encouraging results in the treatment of peritoneal metastasis (PM). The current recommendations require at least 3 sessions of PIPAC. However, some patients do not complete the full treatment course and stop after only 1 or 2 procedures, hence the limited benefit. A literature review was performed, with search terms including “PIPAC” and “pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy.”
Content
Only articles describing the causes for premature termination of the PIPAC treatment were analysed. The systematic search identified 26 published clinical articles related to PIPAC and reporting causes for stopping PIPAC.
Summary
The series range from 11 to 144 patients, with a total of 1352 patients treated with PIPAC for various tumours. A total of 3088 PIPAC treatments were performed. The median number of PIPAC treatments per patient was 2.1, the median PCI score at the time of the first PIPAC was 19 and the number of patients who did not complete the recommended 3 sessions of PIPAC was 714 (52.8%). Disease progression was the main reason for early termination of the PIPAC treatment (49.1%). The other causes were death, patients’ wishes, adverse events, conversion to curative cytoreductive surgery and other medical reasons (embolism, pulmonary infection, etc…).
Outlook
Further investigations are necessary to better understand the causes for interrupting PIPAC treatment and also improving the selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from PIPAC.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference45 articles.
1. Alyami, M, Hübner, M, Grass, F, Bakrin, N, Villeneuve, L, Laplace, N, et al.. Pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy: rationale, evidence, and potential indications. Lancet Oncol 2019;20:e368–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30318-3. 2. Grass, F, Vuagniaux, A, Teixeira-Farinha, H, Lehmann, K, Demartines, N, Hübner, M. Systematic review of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis. Br J Surg 2017;104:669–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10521. 3. Girardot-Miglierina, A, Clerc, D, Alyami, M, Villeneuve, L, Sgarbura, O, Reymond, MA, et al.. Consensus statement on safety measures for pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy. Pleura Peritoneum 2021;6:139–49. https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2021-0125. 4. Sgarbura, O, Villeneuve, L, Alyami, M, Bakrin, N, Torrent, JJ, Eveno, C, et al.. Current practice of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC): still standardized or on the verge of diversification? Eur J Surg Oncol 2021;47:149–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.08.020. 5. Horvath, P, Beckert, S, Struller, F, Königsrainer, A, Reymond, MA. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for peritoneal metastases of pancreas and biliary tract cancer. Clin Exp Metastasis 2018;35:635–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-018-9925-7.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|