Consensus statement on safety measures for pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy

Author:

Girardot-Miglierina Arnaud1,Clerc Daniel1ORCID,Alyami Mohammad2,Villeneuve Laurent34,Sgarbura Olivia567ORCID,Reymond Marc-André8,Hübner Martin1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Visceral Surgery , Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL) , Lausanne , Switzerland

2. Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology , Oncology Center, King Khalid Hospital , Najran , Saudi Arabia

3. Department of Public Health , Clinical Research and Epidemiological Unit, Lyon University Hospital , Lyon , France

4. University of Lyon , Lyon , France

5. Department of Surgical Oncology , Cancer Institute Montpellier (ICM) , Montpellier , France

6. University of Montpellier , Montpellier , France

7. IRCM, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier , Montpellier , France

8. Department of General and Transplant Surgery , University Hospital Tübingen and National Center for Pleura and Peritoneum , Tübingen , Germany

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a promising treatment for peritoneal cancer that entails, however, potential risks for the caregivers in the operating room (OR). This study aimed to reach a consensus within the PIPAC community on a comprehensive safety protocol. Methods Active PIPAC centers were invited to participate in a two-round Delphi process on 43 predefined items: concise summaries of the existing evidence were presented together with questions formulated using the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome framework. According to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, the strength of recommendation was voted by panelists, accepting a consensus threshold of ≥50% of the agreement for any of the four grading options, or ≥70% in either direction. Results Forty-seven out of 66 invited panelists answered both rounds (response rate 76%). The consensus was reached for 41 out of 43 items (95.3%). Strong and weak recommendations were issued for 30 and 10 items, respectively. A positive consensual recommendation was issued to activate laminar airflow without specific strength, neither strong nor weak. No consensus was reached for systematic glove change for caregivers with a high risk of exposure and filtering facepiece mask class 3 for caregivers with low risk of exposure. Conclusions A high degree of consensus was reached for a comprehensive safety protocol for PIPAC, adapted to the risk of exposure for the different caregivers in the OR. This consensus can serve as a basis for education and help reach a high degree of adherence in daily practice.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Internal Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3