First encounter effects in testing of highly automated vehicles during two experimental occasions – The need for recurrent testing

Author:

Andersson Jonas1ORCID,Habibovic Azra1,Rizgary Daban1

Affiliation:

1. RISE Research Institutes of Sweden , Lindholmpspiren 3A , , Göteborg , Sweden

Abstract

Abstract To explore driver behavior in highly automated vehicles (HAVs), independent researchers are mainly conducting short experiments. This limits the ability to explore drivers’ behavioral changes over time, which is crucial when research has the intention to reveal human behavior beyond the first-time use. The current paper shows the methodological importance of repeated testing in experience and behavior related studies of HAVs. The study combined quantitative and qualitative data to capture effects of repeated interaction between drivers and HAVs. Each driver ( n = 8 n=8 ) participated in the experiment on two different occasions (∼90 minutes) with one-week interval. On both occasions, the drivers traveled approximately 40 km on a rural road at AstaZero proving grounds in Sweden and encountered various traffic situations. The participants could use automated driving (SAE level 4) or choose to drive manually. Examples of data collected include gaze behavior, perceived safety, as well as interviews and questionnaires capturing general impressions, trust and acceptance. The analysis shows that habituation effects were attenuated over time. The drivers went from being exhilarated on the first occasion, to a more neutral behavior on the second occasion. Furthermore, there were smaller variations in drivers’ self-assessed perceived safety on the second occasion, and drivers were faster to engage in non-driving related activities and become relaxed (e. g., they spent more time glancing off road and could focus more on non-driving related activities such as reading). These findings suggest that exposing drivers to HAVs on two (or more) successive occasions may provide more informative and realistic insights into driver behavior and experience as compared to only one occasion. Repeating an experiment on several occasions is of course a balance between the cost and added value, and future research should investigate in more detail which studies need to be repeated on several occasions and to what extent.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Computer Science

Reference35 articles.

1. SAE International, “Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles (J3016_201806),” 2018.

2. V. Melcher, S. Rauh, F. Diederichs, H. Widlroither, and W. Bauer, “Take-over requests for automated driving,” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 3, pp. 2867–2873, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.788.

3. A. Habibovic, J. Andersson, J. Nilsson, M. Nilsson, and C. Edgren, “Command-Based Driving for Tactical Control of Highly Automated Vehicles,” in Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation: Proceedings of the AHFE 2016 International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, July 27–31, 2016, Walt Disney World®, Florida, USA, N. A. Stanton, S. Landry, G. Di Bucchianico, and A. Vallicelli, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 499–510.

4. D. R. Large, G. Burnett, D. Salanitri, A. Lawson, and E. Box, “A Longitudinal Simulator Study to Explore Drivers’ Behaviour in Level 3 Automated Vehicles,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 2019, pp. 222–232, doi: 10.1145/3342197.3344519.

5. A. H. Jamson, N. Merat, O. M. J. Carsten, and F. C. H. Lai, “Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 30, pp. 116–125, May 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2013.02.008.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Enlightening mode awareness;Personal and Ubiquitous Computing;2023-11-24

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3