Affiliation:
1. Center for Language Education , The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology , Clear Water Bay , Hong Kong
2. Department of English and Communication , The Hong Kong Polytechnic University , Kowloon , Hong Kong
3. Department of Chinese and Bilingual Studies , The Hong Kong Polytechnic University , Kowloon , Hong Kong
Abstract
Abstract
Linguistic synesthesia links two concepts from two distinct sensory domains and creates conceptual conflicts at the level of embodied cognition. Previous studies focused on constraints on the directionality of synesthetic mapping as a way to establish the conceptual hierarchy among the five senses (i.e., vision, hearing, taste, smell, and touch). This study goes beyond examining the directionality of conventionalized synesthetic terms by adopting a Conceptual Metaphor Theory approach (i.e., the Conceptual Mapping Model) to test if conventional synesthetic directionality still holds when it comes to novel metaphorical expressions. The subjects, 308 native English speakers, are asked to judge the degree of commonness, appropriateness, understandability, and figurativeness in order to measure the degree of comprehensibility of novel synesthetic metaphors. Our findings demonstrate that novel synesthetic metaphors that follow conventional directionality are considered more common, more appropriate, and easier to comprehend than those that violate conventional mapping principles; they are also judged as more literal than those that do not follow conventional directionality. This study explores linguistic synesthesia from the perspective of comprehension of novel synesthetic metaphors, posits a pivotal position for mapping principles in synesthetic directionality, and supports an embodied account of linguistic synesthesia.
Funder
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference53 articles.
1. Ahrens, Kathleen. 2010. Mapping principles for conceptual metaphors. In Cameron Lynne, Alice Deignan, Graham Low & Zazie Todd (eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world, 185–207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2. Ahrens, Kathleen, Siaw-Fong Chung & Chu-Ren Huang. 2004. From lexical semantics to conceptual metaphors: Mapping principle verification with WordNet and SUMO. In Donghong Ji, Kim Teng Lua & Hui Wang (eds.), Recent advancement in Chinese lexical semantics: Proceedings of 5th Chinese lexical semantics workshop (CLSW-5), 99–106. Singapore: COLIPS.
3. Ahrens, Kathleen & Shu-Ping Gong. 2021. Contextual congruency and novel metaphor integration. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 8(1). 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00068.ahr.
4. Ahrens, Kathleen, Ho-Ling Liu, Chia-Ying Lee, Shu-PingShin-Yi Fang Gong & Yuan-Yu Hsu. 2007. Functional MRI of conventional and anomalous metaphors in Mandarin Chinese. Brain and Language 100(2). 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.10.004.
5. Bowdle, Brian F. & Dedre Gentner. 2005. The career of metaphor. Psychological Review 112(1). 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.112.1.193.