A MODEL FOR AUTOMATED MATCHING BETWEEN JOB MARKET DEMAND AND UNIVERSITY CURRICULA OFFER-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A MODEL FOR AUTOMATED MATCHING BETWEEN JOB MARKET DEMAND AND UNIVERSITY CURRICULA OFFER

Published:2017-12-20 Issue:2 Volume:12 Page:188-217
ISSN:1857-8462
Container-title:SEEU Review
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Januzaj Ylber¹,Luma Artan¹,Selimi Besnik¹,Aliu Azir¹,Raufi Bujar¹,Snopçe Halil¹

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Contemporary Sciences and Technologies, South East European University, Tetovo , Macedonia

Abstract

Abstract Technology plays a very important role in virtually all areas, and has become an inseparable part of the industry. Currently, industry and technology are at a high point of development and research, but there is an ever increasing gap between the market needs and the skills that universities deliver to students. There is an increasing need for consolidation between university curricula and the industry needs in terms of qualifications. In this paper we will present a description of the current state of the labor market in the field of technology, including the needs that arise in improving the existing curricula of the Universities. We review the different technologies that can be used, in order to automatically gather information about the market needs in terms of job offers, and how they can be compared against University curricula. We will also present the latest achievements on these methods, and the suggestions that the researchers provide.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference78 articles.

1. [1] M. Agaoglu, “Predicting Instructor Performance Using Data Mining Techniques in Higher Education”. In IEEE Access, May 2016.

2. [2] T. Xie, Q. Zheng, W. Zhang, H, Qu, “Modeling and Predicting the Active Video - Viewing Time in a Large - Scale E - Learning System”.In IEEE Access, June 2017.

3. [3] A. M. Njeru, M. S. Omar, S. Yi, “IoTs for Capturing and Mastering Massive Data Online Learning Courses”. In IEEE Computer Society, ICIS, Wuhan, China, May 2017.

4. [4] R. Heartfield, G. Loukas, D. Gan, “You are probably not the weakest link: Towards Practical Prediction of Susceptibility to Semantic Social Engineering Attacks”. In IEEE Access, October 2016.

5. [5] E. J. Fortuny, D. Martens, “Active Learning - Based Pedagogical Rule Extraction”. In IEEE Transaction on Neural Network and Learning Systems, Vol. 26, No. 11, November 2015.