Affiliation:
1. Department of MEMOTEF , University of Rome La Sapienza , Rome , Italy
Abstract
Abstract
This paper focuses on issues of multimodal literacy practices in ESP higher education settings. In particular, the research explores how students become engaged in various literacy activities aimed at enhancing their critical-thinking skills and interpretation of images. For this purpose, two datasets consisting of video clips were extracted from a larger multimodal corpus and developed for teaching applications: one involved a UK live parliament debate and the other a US House of Representatives debate. The main objective is to identify the key verbal strategies reflecting persuasive, argumentative rhetoric and the non-verbal features accompanying these verbal utterances such as prosodic stress, body/head movements, gaze, gesture. Thus, the focus of the analysis is on how different semiotic modes of communication construct meaning, especially in terms of how they reinforce the construction of identity and ideological stance. The results were systematically categorized and applied on a practical level to a teaching unit on ‘identity and ideology’.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Communication
Reference31 articles.
1. Baldry, A. and Thibault, P.J. (2006). A multimodal transcription and text analysis: a multimedia toolkit and coursebook. London: Equinox.
2. Bateman, J. (2008). Multimodality and genre: a foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
3. Bevitori, C. (2004). Negotiating conflict: interruptions in British and Italian parliamentary debates. In: P. Bayley (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins, pp. 87–109.
4. Bezemer, J. and Kress, G. (2016). Multimodality, learning and communication: a social semiotic frame. London: Routledge.
5. Cope, B. and Kalantzis, M. (2009). A grammar of multimodality. Int. J. Learn. 16: 361–423.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献