From Prejudice to Polarization and Rejection of Democracy

Author:

Pickel Gert1,Pickel Susanne2

Affiliation:

1. Theology Department , University of Leipzig , Leipzig , Germany

2. Institute for Political Science, University Duisburg-Essen , Duisburg , Germany

Abstract

AbstractWith the growing success of right-wing populism, there has been an explosion of debates on polarization and social cohesion. In part, social cohesion is seen as being disrupted by right-wing populists and those who blame migration for this alleged disruption of cohesion. The developing polarization is not only social, but also political, so that in some cases there is already talk of a new cleavage. On the one hand, there are right-wing populists, people who do not want any major changes or who have problems with globalization; on the other hand, there are those who want to push through a transformation towards a ‘truly’ pluralistic society. Two issues in particular serve as bridges for this polarization: Muslim migration and the expansion of sexual and gender diversity. Positions on these two issues mark the content that facilitates the consolidation of opposing group identities. As a result, debates about values and identity dominate, leading to a polarization that reaches far into society.

Funder

BMBF - Forschungsinstitut Gesellschaftlicher Zusammenhalt

BMBF - Radikaler Islam

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Philosophy,Sociology and Political Science

Reference110 articles.

1. Abrams, N., and S. Fish. 2020. “The Polarization Paradox.” Journal of Democracy 30 (2): 182–5. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2020.0030.

2. Adorno, T. 1973. Studien zum autoritären Charakter. Frankfurt, Main: Suhrkamp.

3. Adorno, T., E. Frenkel-Brunswik, D. J. Levinson, and N. Sanford. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper & Brothers.

4. AfD. 2021. Deutschland. Aber Normal. https://www.afd.de/joerg-meuthen-und-tino-chrupalla-zur-bundestagswahlkampagne-der-afd-2021/.

5. Alexopoulou, M. 2021. “Ignoring Racism in the History of the German Immigration Society: Some Reflections on Comparison as an Epistemic Practice.” Journal of the History of Knowledge 2 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5334/jhk.43.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3