Toxicity in the trans debate: what are the psychological phenomena that turn an issue of mental health and social inclusion into a forum for vitriolically vicious social exclusion?

Author:

MacLennan Nigel

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore and document some of the phenomena that seem to have toxified the trans debate. Design/methodology/approach To create a partial compilation of the phenomena most known to cloud human judgement and reasoning, using the trans debate as the prime example. Findings The trans debate seems to have been increasingly toxified in ways predicted by well-documented psychological phenomena. Research limitations/implications Although much is known about the psychological toxifiers on an individual basis, little is known about how they interact to cause the emergence and amplification of toxic debate. Practical implications It is anticipated by studying the emergence of the toxicity around the trans debate, that the descent into toxic discourse in many other contexts can be better understood. Social implications If lessons can be learnt from the descent into toxicity in the trans debate, and its participants become aware of their behaviour, perhaps they can better work towards a mutually acceptable solution. Originality/value By compiling the factors responsible for the toxification of debate, it is hoped that what appear to be the precursors of all conflict and war can be better understood, prevented or avoided.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference57 articles.

1. Terminology and trans definitions in transphobia research: a conceptual review;Quaderns de Psicologia,2018

2. Explaining transphobia and discrimination against trans people: a review of theoretical approaches;Psicologia & Sociedade,2020

3. The problem of speaking for others;Cultural Critique,1991

4. Studies of independence and conformity: i. A minority of one against a unanimous majority;Psychological Monographs: General and Applied,1956

5. So right it’s wrong: groupthink and the ubiquitous nature of polarized group decision making;Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,2005

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3