Affiliation:
1. Vytautas Magnus University , Faculty of Political Sciences and Diplomacy , Lithuania
2. Klaipėda University , Faculty of Social Sciences , Lithuania
Abstract
Abstract
The article discusses the issues of employee financial participation in Baltic states which differs and depends on political, legal and economic preconditions. The aim of the research is to analyse employee financial participation as an instrument for collaboration in companies and a new social cooperation model in the Baltic states. The qualitative research was conducted by telephone and e-mail in 2016. The interviews were carried out with the experts (academics, civil servants, lawyers and human resource consultants working in a relevant field) as well some trade union and company representatives. In general, the new policy for supporting employee financial participation has been renewed in Latvia and Lithuania. It started recently with the revision of the legislative framework that was initially established during the privatisation period. The revision of the Law of Companies was driven by the business interest (to have a new effective human resource management tool or to transfer employee share plans from parent companies in Western countries to subsidiaries in the Baltic states) to introduce (or revise, in the case of Lithuania) new employee share ownership (ESO) plans. The research has also proven that there are common similarities in the use of employee financial participation plans despite the existing differences which are based on national features, such as tax and legal regimes, historical development patterns, or economic and structural factors.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Strategy and Management,Management Information Systems
Reference43 articles.
1. Berķe-Berga, A. (2013a). Development of Employee Share Ownership in Latvia [Doctoral dissertation]. Riga, Latvia: Riga Technical University.
2. Berke-Berga, A. (2013b). Employee ownership model for Latvia. Scientific Journal of Riga Technical University: Economics and Business, 23, 6-12.
3. Berķe-Berga, A. (2014). Development of Employee Share Ownership in Latvia. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 3(1), 167-178.
4. Blasi, J., Freeman, R., & Kruse, D. (2016). Do Broad-based Employee Ownership, Profit Sharing and Stock Options Help the Best Firms Do Even Better? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 54(1), 55-82.
5. Blasi, J. R., Kruse, D. L., & Freeman, R. B. (2010a). Epilogue (and Prologue). In D. L. Kruse, R. B. Freeman, J. R. Blasi (Eds.), Shared Capitalism at Work: Employee Ownership, Profit and Gain Sharing, and Broad-based Stock Options (pp. 377-386). Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献