Evaluation of Basic Trainings for Rescue Forces

Author:

Niemann Lena1ORCID,Thielsch Meinald T.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology , University of Münster , Münster , Germany

Abstract

Abstract Since members of rescue forces such as firefighters have to deal with sometimes extreme and dangerous situations, high-quality basic trainings are indispensable for their professional success. There is therefore an obvious need for standardized tools assessing the training quality. This paper aims to develop and validate such an evaluation instrument. In Study 1, a qualitative analysis (N = 21) was used to identify core characteristics of good firefighter basic trainings and served as theoretical basis for the generation of corresponding items. In Study 2 (N = 257), the item set was piloted and reduced, its structure was assessed in exploratory factor analyses, and first validations were conducted. Study 3 (N = 451) tested the proposed factor structure via confirmatory analyses and validated the questionnaire comprehensively. Factor analyses showed a six-factor structure. The scales of the newly created Feedback Instrument for Rescue forces Education – Basic education (FIRE-B) are to be judged as reliable. Moreover, there are several clear indications of validity. Thus, the present research contributes to the understanding of critical factors and processes of basic trainings. Furthermore, the FIRE-B has a high practical relevance, both in the assessment of training quality and in the identification of opportunities for improvement.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Safety Research,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference72 articles.

1. American Educational Research Association. 2014. American Psychological Association and National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

2. Beavers, A. S., J. W. Lounsbury, J. K. Richards, S. W. Huck, G. J. Skolits, and S. L. Esquivel. 2013. “Practical Considerations for Using Exploratory Factor Analysis in Educational Research.” Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 18 (6): 1–13 https://doi.org/10.7275/qv2q-rk76.

3. Berlin, Johan M., and Eric D. Carlström. 2014. “Collaboration Exercises—The Lack of Collaborative Benefits.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 5 (3): 192–205 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-014-0025-2.

4. Blanchard, N. P., and J. W. Thacker. 2010. Effective Training: Systems, Strategies, and Practices. Prentice Hall: Pearson Education.

5. Blau, G., G. Gibson, M. Bentley, and S. Chapman. 2012. “Testing the Impact of Job‐Related Variables on a Utility Judgment Training Criterion beyond Background and Affective Reaction Variables.” International Journal of Training and Development 16 (1): 54–66 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2011.00390.x.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3