Affiliation:
1. Department of Anthropology , University of California , Los Angeles , CA 90095 , USA
Abstract
Abstract
As Mandarin gains prominence in the globalizing world, the use of Mandarin not only blurs geopolitical borders, but also the linguistic boundaries drawn between Taiwan and Mainland China. Employing the theoretical framework of language ideologies and the methodological approach of perceptual dialectology, this article investigates how the Taiwanese perform their identities by hand-drawing their perceived linguistic boundaries of Mandarin varieties. The data came from a multi-sited linguistic fieldwork project in Taiwan that engaged with forty-two Taiwanese (age 19–56) on tasks that include drawing dialectological maps of Mandarin and extended ethnographic interviews. The data show that rhoticity has been selectively rationalized and ideologized as boundary of linguistic differentiation between Mandarin varieties across the Taiwan Strait. This article further examines the ways in which the informants, by surpassing the geospatial indexicality of Taiwan Mandarin as a vernacular, rationalize and project the existing stylistic use of Taiwan Mandarin onto their sociopolitical construals, creating a space where Taiwan Mandarin is equivalent to Putonghua in symbolic power. This study demonstrates the ways in which perceived dialectological maps functions as visualized indexical fields that mirror the multiplicity and volatility of participants’ concurrent language ideologies about the complicated relationship between language and the micro- as well as macro-sociopolitical environments they inhabit.
Reference48 articles.
1. Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
3. Avineri, Netta & Paul V. Kroskrity. 2014. On the (re-)production and representation of endangered language communities: Social boundaries and temporal borders. Language & Communication 38. 1–7.10.1016/j.langcom.2014.05.003
4. Blommaert, Jan & Jef Verschueren. 1998. The role of language in European nationalist ideologies. In Bambi Schieffelin, Kathryn Woolard & Paul Kroskrity (eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory, 189–210. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information 16(6). 645–668.10.1177/053901847701600601
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献