Scaffolding for chemistry students – which tools are assessed as being more helpful: stepped supporting tools or task navigators?

Author:

Hermanns Jolanda1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universitat Potsdam , Center for Teacher Training and Education and Department of Chemistry , Karl-Liebknechtstraße 24-25 , 14476 Potsdam , 14469 Potsdam , Germany

Abstract

Abstract In this paper the use of two different scaffolds in a seminar on the topic of heterocycles is discussed. The students first used both scaffolds (stepped supporting tools and a task navigator) on two tasks and could then choose for one other task the scaffold that suited them more. The scaffolds were evaluated in a mixed-methods study by the use of questionnaires and the conducting of a focus group interview. Both scaffolds were assessed as being helpful. However, students who thought they didn’t need different sorts of tips, as provided by the task navigator, chose the stepped supporting tools. All students reflected on their use of the scaffolds; their choices for one of both are therefore well-founded. As the reasons for choosing the scaffold are very individual, in future seminars both types of scaffolds will be provided.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference27 articles.

1. Allen, E., & Seaman, C. (2007). Likert scales and date analyses. Quality Progress, 7, 64–65.

2. Anderson, T. L., & Bodner, G. M. (2008). What can we do about “Parker”? A case study of a good student who didn’t get organic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9, 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1039/b806223b.

3. Broman, K., Bernholt, S., & Parchmann, I. (2018). Using model-based scaffolds to support students solving context-based chemistry problems. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 40(10), 1176–1197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1470350.

4. Caspari, I., & Graulich, N. (2019). Scaffolding the structure of organic chemistry students’ multivariate comparative mechanistic reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 31–43.

5. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3