When Students Design University: a Case Study of Creative Interdisciplinarity between Design Thinking and Humanities

Author:

Molinari Alessandra1,Gasparini Andrea Alessandro2

Affiliation:

1. Università degli Studi di Urbino “Carlo Bo” , DISCUI - Palazzo Petrangolini, Piazza Rinascimento, 7, 61029 , Urbino (PU), Italy

2. Department of Informatics , University of Oslo , N-0373 OSLO , Norway

Abstract

Abstract This paper addresses the issue of how to enhance student participation in university governance. This issue is approached by taking into account the growing pressures of the European Commission’s modernization agenda on the educational policies of the European Higher Education Area, and by focusing on the way these pressures affect students’ conceptions of themselves and of the mission of higher education. The thesis presented in this paper is that design thinking and the humanities share a common epistemological core that enables them, if applied in educational settings, to play a major role in fostering students’ trust in their governance skills and in their ability to influence educational policies through a creative mindset and a deeper comprehension of the stakes in present-day higher education. An experimental workshop combining design thinking with the humanities and with the constructivist approach of student-centered learning was held within a course in a humanities bachelor program on the basis of a heuristic framework developed through an interdisciplinary research process. This process was conducted according to the principles of design and hermeneutics. The outcomes of the workshop in terms of the participants’ enhanced self-confidence and decisional skills validate the thesis of this study.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education

Reference98 articles.

1. Almendra, R. & Christiaans, H. (2013). ‘Design thinking’: the Emperor’s new suit. Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal: Annual Review. Volume 6. Champain, Illinois: Common Ground, 1-19. http://designprinciplesandpractices.com/.

2. Ast, F. (1808). Grundlinien der Grammatik, Hermeneutik und Kritik. Landshut: Jos. Thomann.

3. Battarbee, K., Fulton Suri, J. & Gibbs Howard, S. (2015). Empathy on the edge. Scaling and sustaining a human-centered approach in the evolving practice of design. Case Study. Harvard Business Review.

4. Barsalou, L.W. (2017). Define design thinking. she ji The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 3 (2), pp. 102-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2017.10.007

5. Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms, London: Routledge.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3