Affiliation:
1. 26524 Technische Universität Berlin , Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics , Marchstraße 23 , Berlin , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
Highly automated cars will be on the worlds’ roads within the next decade. In highly automated driving the vehicle’s lateral and longitudinal controls can be passed on from the driver to the vehicle and back again. The design of a vehicle’s take-over requests will largely determine the driver’s performance after taking back vehicle control. In the scope of this paper, potential drivers of highly automated cars were asked about their preferences regarding the human-machine interface design of take-over requests. Participants were asked to evaluate eight different take-over requests that differed with respect to (a) take-over request procedure (one-step or two-step procedure), (b) visual take-over request modality (text or text and pictogram), and (c) auditory take-over request modality (tone or speech). Results showed that participants preferred a two-step procedure using text and speech to communicate take-over requests. A subsequent conjoint analysis revealed that take-over requests ideally use speech output in a two-step procedure. Finally, a detailed evaluation showed that the best take-over request interface received significantly higher user experience ratings regarding product characteristics as well as users’ emotions and consequences of product use than the worst take-over request interface. Results are related to the background literature and practical implications are discussed.
Subject
Computer Networks and Communications,Human-Computer Interaction,Communication,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Information Systems,Social Psychology
Reference39 articles.
1. Albert, M., Lange, A., Schmidt, A., Wimmer, M., & Bengler, K. (2015). Automated driving – assessment of interaction concepts under real driving conditions. Procedia Manufacturing 3, 2832–2839.
2. Bengler, K., Dietmayer, K., Färber, B., Maurer, M., Stiller, C., & Winner, H. (2014). Three decades of driver assistance systems – review and future perspectives. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Magazine 6(4), 6–22.
3. Borojeni, S.S., Chuang, L., Heuten, W., & Boll, S. (2016). Assisting drivers with ambient take-over requests in highly automated driving. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 237–244). DOI: 10.1145/3003715.3005409.
4. Brandenburg, S. & Chuang, L. (in review). Take-over requests during highly automated driving: How should they be presented and under which conditions? Transportation research part F.
5. Brandenburg, S. & Skottke, E.M. (2014). Switching from manual to automated driving and reverse: Are drivers behaving more risky after highly automated driving? In IEEE Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), IEEE (pp. 2978–2983). DOI: 10.1109/ITSC.2014.6958168.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献