Dietary modeling of greenhouse gases using OECD meat consumption/retail availability estimates
Author:
Lincke Susan J.1, Wolf Joy J.2
Affiliation:
1. Department of Computer Science , University of Wisconsin-Parkside , 900 Wood Road , Kenosha , WI , USA 2. Department of Geography and Anthropology , University of Wisconsin-Parkside , 900 Wood Road , Kenosha , WI , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Research has demonstrated different carbon footprints, based on portion estimations. However, previous estimates are low and often omit the impact of food waste. For example, a high-level of daily meat consumption has been estimated at 100 g, which is less than a typical “quarter pounder” hamburger. We used the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) annual estimates of national retail availability, and applied a mathematical model to prorate other research results to determine a meat portion equal to current OECD statistics, and also projected the diets to 2500 and 3250 kcal, to include consumer and retail waste. Once prorated, the 14 national studies are contrasted and analyzed for reasonableness against OECD data pertaining to U.S., U.K., E.U., vegetarian and vegan diets. We quantify how previous studies underestimated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and show that previous GHG study results for the highest tier most accurately predict average national dietary consumption.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Engineering (miscellaneous),Food Science,Biotechnology
Reference35 articles.
1. Sadhukhan, J, Dugmore, TIJ, Matharu, A, Martinez-Hernandez, E, Aburto, J, Rahman, PKSM, et al.. Perspectives on “game changer” global challenges for sustainable 21st century: plant-based diet, unavoidable food waste biorefining, and circular economy. Sustainability 2020;12:1976. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051976. 2. Aleksandrowicz, L, Green, R, Joy, EJM, Smith, P, Haines, A. The impacts of dietary change on greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water use, and health: a systematic review. PLoS One 2016;11:e0165797. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165797. 3. Biesbroek, S, Bueno-de-Mesquita, HB, Peeters, PHM, Verschuren, WM, van der Schouw, YT, Kramer, GF, et al.. Reducing our environmental footprint and improving our health: greenhouse gas emission and land use of usual diet and mortality in EPIC-NL: a prospective cohort study. BioMed Cent 2014;13:13–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069x-13-27. 4. González-García, S, Esteve-Lorens, X, Moreira, MT, Feijoo, G. Carbon footprint and nutritional quality of different human dietary choices. Sci Total Environ 2018;644:77–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.339. 5. Scarborough, P, Appleby, PN, Mizdrak, A, Briggs, ADM, Travis, RC, Bradbury, KE, et al.. Dietary greenhouse gas emissions of meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans in the UK. Clim Change 2014;125:179–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1169-1.
|
|