ISO/TS 20914:2019 – a critical commentary

Author:

Farrance Ian1,Frenkel Robert23,Badrick Tony4

Affiliation:

1. Discipline of Laboratory Medicine, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences , RMIT University , Victoria , Australia

2. Roseville , New South Wales , Australia

3. former affiliation: National Measurement Institute Australia , West Lindfield , New South Wales , Australia

4. RCPA Quality Assurance Programs , St Leonards , New South Wales , Australia

Abstract

Abstract The long-anticipated ISO/TS 20914, Medical laboratories – Practical guidance for the estimation of measurement uncertainty, became publicly available in July 2019. This ISO document is intended as a guide for the practical application of estimating uncertainty in measurement (measurement uncertainty) in a medical laboratory. In some respects, the guide does indeed meet many of its stated objectives with numerous very detailed examples. Even though it is claimed that this ISO guide is based on the Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM), JCGM 100:2008, it is with some concern that we believe several important statements and statistical procedures are incorrect, with others potentially misleading. The aim of this report is to highlight the major concerns which we have identified. In particular, we believe the following items require further comment: (1) The use of coefficient of variation and its potential for misuse requires clarification, (2) pooled variance and measurement uncertainty across changes in measuring conditions has been oversimplified and is potentially misleading, (3) uncertainty in the results of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) do not include all known uncertainties, (4) the international normalized ratio (INR) calculation is incorrect, (5) the treatment of bias uncertainty is considered problematic, (6) the rules for evaluating combined uncertainty in functional relationships are incomplete, and (7) specific concerns with some individual statements.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Biochemistry, medical,Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine

Reference25 articles.

1. International Organization for Standardization. Medical laboratories – practical guidance for the estimation of measurement uncertainty. ISO/TS 20914:2009.

2. Bureau International des Pois et Mesures. Evaluation of measurement data – guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement(GUM). Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology 100:2008. http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html (accessed November 2019).

3. International Organization for Standardization. Medical laboratories – requirements for quality and competence. ISO 15189:2003.

4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Expression of measurement uncertainty in laboratory medicine; Approved Guideline. CLSI document EP29-A, Wayne, PA, 2012.

5. Farrance I, Frenkel R. Uncertainty in measurement: a review of the rules for calculating uncertainty components through functional relationships. Clin Biochem Rev 2012;33:49–75.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3