Author:
Oyaert Matthijs,Speeckaert Marijn M.,Delanghe Joris R.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Urinary conductivity allows a coarse prediction of urinary osmolality in most cases but is insensitive to the osmolal contribution of uncharged particles and the presence of roentgen contrast media. Urinary osmolality can be estimated on the recently introduced Sysmex UF-5000 urine analyzer using conductivity. In this study, we evaluated the analytical performance of this research parameter. Secondly, we aimed to improve the manufacturer’s algorithm for estimating urinary osmolality, based on standard urinalysis parameters (creatinine, glucose, relative density).
Methods
The analytical performance was determined and a prediction model to estimate urinary osmolality based on urinalysis parameters was developed. We further developed and validated a prediction model using another set of routine urine samples. In addition, the influence of roentgen contrast media on urinary osmolality was studied.
Results
The within-run and between imprecision for osmolality and conductivity measured on the Sysmex UF-5000 ranged from 1.1% to 4.9% and 0.7% to 4.8%, respectively. Multiple regression analysis revealed urinary creatinine, conductivity and relative density to be the strongest predictors to estimate urinary osmolality. A mean difference of 1.3 mOsm/kg between measured and predicted osmolality demonstrated that the predictive performance of our model was favorable. An excellent correlation between the relative density and % contrast media was demonstrated.
Conclusions
Urinary osmolality is an important parameter for assessing specimen dilution in urinalysis. Urinary conductivity, along with relative density and urinary creatinine allows a coarse prediction of urinary osmolality and is insensitive to the osmolal contribution of uncharged particles and the presence of roentgen contrast media.
Subject
Biochemistry, medical,Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine
Reference48 articles.
1. Reference values for analytes of 24-h urine collections known to be complete;Ann Clin Biochem,1988
2. Use of SGLT2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes: weighing the risks and benefits;Diabetologia,2018
3. Limit of blank, limit of detection and limit of quantification;Clin Biochem Rev,2008
4. Comparison of hydrometry, refractometry, osmometry, and Ames N-Multistix SG in estimation of urinary concentration;Aust Paediatr J,1985
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献