Affiliation:
1. Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (ILLC), University of Amsterdam, 1012 GC Amsterdam, Netherlands
Abstract
Abstract
I would like to attack a certain view: the view that the concept of identity can fail to apply to some things although, for some positive integer n, we have n of them. The idea of entities without self-identity is seriously entertained in the philosophy of quantum mechanics (QM). It is so pervasive that it has been labelled the Received View (French and Krause 2006. Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis. Oxford: Oxford UP: 105). I introduce the Received View in Section 1. In Section 2 I explain what I mean by “entity” (synonymously, by “object” and “thing”), and I argue that supporters of the Received View should agree with my characterization of the corresponding notion of entity (object, thing). I also explain what I mean by “identity”, and I show that supporters of the Received View agree with my characterization of that notion. In Section 3 I argue that the concept of identity, so characterized, is one with the concept of oneness. Thus, it cannot but apply to what belongs to a collection with n elements, n being a positive integer. In Section 4 I add some considerations on the primitiveness of identity or unity and the status of the Identity of Indiscernibles. In Section 5 I address the problem of how reference to indiscernible objects with identity can be achieved.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Does the Blackbody Radiation Spectrum Suggest an Intrinsic Structure of Photons?;Quantum Reports;2024-02-13
2. What is a Quantum Object?;Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science;2024
3. A no-individuals account of quantum mechanics;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences;2023-07-31
4. Exploring Human Identity From Social, Cultural, Philosophical, and Biopolitical Perspectives;Bioethics of Displacement and Its Implications;2023-06-16
5. Why I am not an Anti-Haecceitist;Synthese;2023-01-16