Geotechnical Site Investigation Using S-waves with Implications for Ground Motion Analysis
Author:
Hassan Bilal1, Butt Stephen D.1, Hurich Charles A.2
Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science , Memorial University of Newfoundland , Canada 2. Department of Earth Sciences , Memorial University of Newfoundland , Canada
Abstract
Abstract
Evaluation results of shear wave attenuation-based ground motion restricted by fracture orientation and rheology, from among those of an extended experimental study, are presented herein. The issues of competence of fractured bedrock dynamically disturbed multilaterally are assessed. Disturbance is primarily modelled by Sh and Sv stimulation, given fracture orientation, while subjected to direct fracture stress regime conditions varying in time. Hence, directionalities of polarisation and stress are taken into consideration simultaneously following simple site-specific non-erodetic approach. Comparison of spectral curves and spectral ratio curves of attenuation with respect to variations of direction and stress emphasise the amplification of the ‘seismic response’ in one direction compared to the other, i.e. vertical vs. horizontal, in terms of weighing possibilities of or predicting structural integrity against failure. The composite analyses of multiple spectral curves not only enable determination of the orientation of the fracture set/s in space but also allow inferring the nature of more amplified response perpendicular to the crack surface compared to that of a response parallel to the crack surface.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Reference24 articles.
1. [1] Frempong, P., Donald, A.,Butt, S.D. (2007): The effect of pore pressure depletion and injection cycles on ultrasonic velocity and quality factor in a quartz sandstone. Geophysics, 72 (2), pp. E43-E51. doi: 10.1190/1.2424887.10.1190/1.2424887 2. [2] Hassan, B. (2017): Investigation of integrated geophysical methods to characterize near surface formations for enviromental engineering. Ph.D. Thesis.St. John’s: Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada 2017; 68,87,91 p. 3. [3] Marek, R.A., Bray, J.D., Abrahamson, N. (1999): Task 3: Characterization of Site Response: General Site Categories. In: PEER Report 1999/03. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Pacific Gas and Electric Company and David and Lucile Packard Foundation, University of California: Berkeley; pp. 1–36. 4. [4] Dobry, R., Borcherdt, R.D., Crouse C.B., Idriss, I.M., Joyner, W.B., Martin, G.R., Power, M.S., Rinne, E.E., Seed, R.B. (2000): New site coefficients and site classification system used in recent building seismic code provisions. Earthquake spectra, 16 (1), pp. 41–67. doi:10.1193/1.1586082.10.1193/1.1586082 5. [5] Abrahamson, N.A., Silva, W.J. (1997): Empirical Response Spectral Attenuation Relationships for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters, 68(1), pp. 94–127.10.1785/gssrl.68.1.94
|
|