Affiliation:
1. Ghent University - Faculty of Arts and Philosophy Department of Translation Interpreting and Communication Ghent Belgium
Abstract
Abstract
This article addresses the relationship between linguistic politeness and addressee status in the performance of written requests in French. According to a first view, conventionalized Can you followed by a verbal phrase (in short, Can you VP?) “indirect requests” (IRs) are preferred because they enable speakers to convey politeness effects absent in imperatives. According to an alternative view, Can you VP? is the standard polite request form in written communication because it avoids impoliteness implications. To test these two competing hypotheses, I carried out a production task experiment with 122 native speakers of Belgian French writing email requests. In this experiment, addressee status was manipulated. An important finding is that higher addressee status does not increase the frequency of Can you VP? requests. Instead of using Can you VP? more often when they address higher status people, the participants used specific politeness markers such as formal greetings and the V-form of address. These results disconfirm the hypothesis that Can you VP? is used to convey extra politeness effects and suggests instead that people use such IRs to avoid the risk of being considered impolite.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Communication,Language and Linguistics,Cultural Studies,Social Psychology
Reference65 articles.
1. Aijmer, Karin. 1996. Conversational routines in English: convention and creativity. London: Longman.
2. Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3. Bates, Elizabeth. 1976. Language and Context. The acquisition of pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.
4. Biesenbach-Lucas, Sigrun. 2007. Students writing emails to faculty: An examination of e-politeness among native and non-native speakers of English. Language Learning and Technology. 11. 59-81.
5. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1987. Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different? Journal of Pragmatics 11(2). 131-146.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献