ProACT in the management of stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. What happens after 8 years of follow up? monocentric analysis in 42 patients
Author:
Bada Maida1, Crocetto Felice2, Barone Biagio2ORCID, Arcaniolo Davide2, Rapisarda Sebastiano3, Aliberti Antonio4, Zeccolini Guglielmo1, Celia Antonio1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Urology , Hospital “San Bassiano” , Via dei Lotti 40, 36061, Bassano del Grappa (VI) , Italy 2. Department of Neuroscience , Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II” , Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 , Napoli (NA) , Italy 3. Department of Urology , Hospital “Pederzoli” , Via Monte Baldo 24, 37019 , Peschiera del Garda (VR) , Italy 4. Department of Urology , Hospital “San Leonardo” , ASL Napoli 3 Sud, Via Salvador Allende 68, 80053 , Castellammare di Stabia (NA) , Italy
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Stress urinary incontinence is defined by a complaint of any involuntary loss of urine on effort or physical exertion or on sneezing or coughing and represents a major complication after radical prostatectomy. According to surgical technique, incidence of post-prostatectomy incontinence varies from open (7–39.5%), laparoscopic (5–33.3%) or robotic-assisted (4–31%) approaches. The ProACT® device (Uromedica, Inc., MN) is a possible surgical option for the treatment of this condition.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed surgical records of consecutive patients underwent ProACT® implantation in our department between January 2006 to November 2010. We collected data at 6 and 12 months after surgical approach about the daily pad use, International Prostatic Symptoms Score and its quality of life domain.
Results
42 patients were included in the final analysis. Most patients (92.9%) received minimally invasive surgery for treating prostate cancer. During the follow up after 6 and 12 months, the daily pad, International Prostatic Symptom Score and its quality of life domain significantly improved compared to preoperative outcomes. The logistic regression analysis found that presence of comorbidities was the only predictive factor of low satisfaction rate (PGE-I > 2) in patients who underwent ProACT® implant.
Conclusions
ProACT® implant represents an effective and safe treatment for post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence with a high satisfaction degree and a low rate of complications.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Drug Discovery,Pharmacology,General Medicine,Physiology
Reference26 articles.
1. Abrams, P, Cardozo, L, Fall, M, Griffiths, D, Rosier, P, Ulmsten, U, et al.. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology 2003;61:37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02243-4. 2. Crivellaro, S, Morlacco, A, Bodo, G, Finazzi Agro’, E, Gozzi, C, Pistolesi, D, et al.. Systematic review of surgical treatment of post radical prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2016;35:875–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22873. 3. Homma, Y, Batista, J, Bauer, S, Griffiths, D, Hilton, P, Kramer, G, et al.. Urodynamics: part X: intrinsic sphincter deficiency, Chapter 7. In: Abrahms, P, Cardozo, L, Khoury, S, Wein, A, editors. Incontinence: 2nd International Consultation on Incontinence, 2nd ed. Plymouth UK: Health Publication Ltd; 2002:351–2 pp. 4. Ficarra, V, Novara, G, Artibani, W, Cestari, A, Galfano, A, Graefen, M, et al.. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 2009;55:1037–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.036. 5. Loughlin, KR, Prasad, MM. Post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: a confluence of 3 factors. J Urol 2010;183:871–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.011.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|