Ergonomic RFID tag placement on surgical instruments – a preliminary user study

Author:

Heibeyn Jan1,Witte Mark1,Billig Sebastian2,Schweizer Matthias3,Janß Armin1,Radermacher Klaus1

Affiliation:

1. Chair of Medical Engineering , 9165 RWTH Aachen University , Aachen , Germany

2. Clinic for Anaesthesiology , 39058 Uniklinik RWTH Aachen , Aachen , Germany

3. 84627 Aesculap AG , Tuttlingen , Germany

Abstract

Abstract Objectives RFID tags on surgical instruments allow tracking of individual instruments. However, the tags on the instruments can restrict the handling, potentially increasing patient risks. Previous studies analyzed hand contact areas to identify potential locations for tags. However, the studies did not conduct interaction tests using instruments equipped with RFID tags, potentially neglecting the influence of haptic perception. In addition, previous studies required time-consuming evaluations by clinicians. Methods Therefore, the present study aims to verify the previous findings in interaction-centered tests with clinicians using real RFID tags on the instruments. Additionally, we had instrument design experts rate RFID tag positions and examined whether they could predict the clinician’s preferred tag positions. Results We found that nearly all RFID tag positions decreased the user satisfaction of clinicians compared to a reference instrument. Compared to previous studies, our study shows that the RFID tag influences the orientations in which an instrument can be comfortably held, which was criticized by clinicians. Instrument design experts could only predict the clinician’s preferred tag positions for some instruments. Conclusions Therefore, we recommend investigating further changes to instrument design, for what the “ideal” positions proposed by the clinicians in this study can provide initial pointers.

Funder

Bundesministerium fuer Bildung und Forschung

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3