Affiliation:
1. USDA–Forest Service, Southern Research Station, 320 Green Street, Athens, Georgia 30602 USA
Abstract
Abstract
In 2012, we tested the relative efficacy of four commercial types of insect traps (panel; standard multiple-funnel; modified multiple-funnel; and sea, land, and air Malaise [SLAM]) for capturing bark and woodboring beetles (Coleoptera) in a pine stand in northcentral Georgia. All traps were baited with ethanol, α-pinene, ipsenol, and ipsdienol lures. The SLAM trap outperformed the panel trap for diversity and abundance of Cerambycidae. Mean catches of Asemum striatum (L.) in SLAM traps were greater than those in all other traps. SLAM traps caught more Acanthocinus obsoletus (LeConte) and Xylotrechus sagittatus (Germar) than standard multiple-funnel funnel and panel traps. The greatest numbers of Monochamus titillator (F.) were in SLAM and modified multiple-funnel traps. In contrast, SLAM traps were inferior to all other trap types in trapping bark beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae). More Dendroctonus terebrans (Olivier), Hylastes porculus Erichson, and Hylastes salebrosus Eichhoff were captured in panel traps than the other types of traps. Catches of Ips avulsus (Eichhoff), Ips calligraphus (Germar), Orthotomicus caelatus (Eichhoff), and Pityophthorus spp. were the same in panel, standard multiple-funnel, and modified multiple-funnel traps. Our data suggest that combinations of trap types should be considered in maximizing the effectiveness of detection programs for pine bark and woodboring beetles.
Publisher
Georgia Entomological Society
Subject
Insect Science,Agronomy and Crop Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference33 articles.
1. Allison,
J.D.,
Bhandari
B.D.,
McKenney
J.L.
and
MillarJ.G.
2014.
Design factors that influence the performance of flight intercept traps for the capture of longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) from the subfamilies Lamiinae and Cerambycinae.PLOS One9:
e93203.
2. Allison,
J.D.
and
RedakR.A.
2017.
The impact of trap type and design features on survey and detection of bark and woodboring beetles and their associates: A review and meta-analysis.Annu. Rev. Entomol.62:
127–
146.
3. Billings,
R.F.
and
UptonW.W.
2010.
A methodology for assessing annual risk of southern pine beetle outbreaks across the southern region using pheromone traps, Pp.
73–
85.
InPye,J.M.,RauscherH.M.,SandsY.,LeeD.C. and
BeattyJ.S. (eds.),
Advances in Threat Assessment and Their Application to Forest and Rangeland Management. Vol.
1.
USDA–Forest Service, Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW–GTR–802.
4. Bouwer,
M.C.,
MacQuarrie
C.J.K.,
Aguirre-Gil
O.J.,
Slippers
B.
and
AllisonJ.D.
2020.
Impact of intercept trap type on plume structure: A potential mechanism for differential performance of intercept trap designs for Monochamus species.J. Pest Sci.93:
993–
1005.
5. Bowers,
J.,
Jackson
L.
and
ZinkR.
2018.
Cooperative Agricultural Pest Survey (CAPS) 2019 National Pest Surveillance Guidelines.USDA–Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services–Plant Protection and Quarantine,
Raleigh, NC. (
https://caps.ceris.purdue.edu/pest-surveillance-guidelines/2019;accessed 11 January 2021)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献