The McMaster Narrative Comment Rating Tool: Development and Initial Validity Evidence-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The McMaster Narrative Comment Rating Tool: Development and Initial Validity Evidence

Published:2023-11-15 Issue: Volume: Page:1-13
ISSN:1040-1334
Container-title:Teaching and Learning in Medicine
language:en
Short-container-title:Teaching and Learning in Medicine

Author:

McGuire Natalie¹^ORCID,Acai Anita²^ORCID,Sonnadara Ranil R.³^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Office of Professional Development and Educational Scholarship, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences and McMaster Education Research, Innovation and Theory (MERIT) Program, McMaster University, and St. Joseph’s Education Research Centre (SERC), St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada

3. Office of Education Science, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Education,General Medicine

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10401334.2023.2276799

Reference51 articles.

1. Core principles of assessment in competency-based medical education

2. Andolsek K Padmore J Hauer KE Ekpenyong A Edgar L Holmboe E. Clinical Competency Committees: A Guidebook for Programs . https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/acgmeclinicalcompetencycommitteeguidebook.pdf. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Published January 2020. Accessed September 2 2022.

3. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Competence commiteees. https://www.royalcollege.ca/ca/en/cbd/impact-cbd/competence-committees.html. Accessed September 2 2022.

4. Beyond summative decision making: Illuminating the broader roles of competence committees

5. How do clinical competency committees use different sources of data to assess residents’ performance on the internal medicine milestones?A mixed methods pilot study