The perception gap: how the benefits and harms of cervical cancer screening are understood in information material focusing on informed choice-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The perception gap: how the benefits and harms of cervical cancer screening are understood in information material focusing on informed choice

Published:2020-02-17 Issue:2 Volume:22 Page:177-196
ISSN:1369-8575
Container-title:Health, Risk & Society
language:en
Short-container-title:Health, Risk & Society

Author:

Byskov Petersen Gabriela¹,Sadolin Damhus Christina¹,Ryborg Jønsson Alexandra Brandt²,Brodersen John²³

Affiliation:

1. Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark

2. The Research Unit for General Practice in Copenhagen, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

3. The Primary Health Care Research Unit, Zealand Region, Denmark

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13698575.2020.1778645

Reference65 articles.

1. Risk communication: identifying the importance of social context1

2. Cacophonophobia

3. A Comprehensive Analysis of Breast Cancer News Coverage in Leading Media Outlets Focusing on Environmental Risks and Prevention

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Danish Women Make Decisions about Participation in Breast Cancer Screening prior to Invitation Information: An Online Survey Using Experimental Methods;Medical Decision Making;2024-05-04

2. Deaths and cardiopulmonary events following colorectal cancer screening—A systematic review with meta-analyses;PLOS ONE;2024-03-14

3. Rethinking the logic of early diagnosis in cancer;Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine;2024-02-26

4. Implementing systematic melanoma risk assessment and risk‐tailored surveillance in a skin cancer focussed dermatology clinic: A qualitative study of feasibility and acceptability to patients and clinic staff;Cancer Medicine;2024-01

5. Fictitious cases as a methodology to discuss sensitive health topics in focus groups;International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being;2023-07-18