Implementing systematic melanoma risk assessment and risk‐tailored surveillance in a skin cancer focussed dermatology clinic: A qualitative study of feasibility and acceptability to patients and clinic staff

Author:

Smith A. L.1,Smit A. K.123ORCID,Laginha B. I.4,Singh N.14,Gallo B.2,Martin L.25,Cust A. E.123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The Daffodil Centre The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW Sydney New South Wales Australia

2. Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

3. Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

4. Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University Sydney New South Wales Australia

5. Faculty of Medicine and Health University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundInternational bodies recommend that melanoma risk assessment should be integrated into skin cancer care provision, but evidence to support implementation is lacking.AimTo explore the acceptability and feasibility of implementing personalised melanoma risk assessment and tailored patient education and skin surveillance within routine clinical care.MethodsThis prospective qualitative implementation study was informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). Personalised, systematic melanoma risk assessment was implemented in the dermatology clinic at the Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia February–May 2021. Pre‐ and post‐implementation observations and semi‐structured interviews with patients and staff were conducted (September 2020–March 2021). Observational notes and interview transcript data were analysed thematically using the TFA as a classifying framework.ResultsA total of 37 h of observations were made, and 29 patients and 12 clinic staff were interviewed. We found that the delivery of personalised melanoma risk estimates did not impact on patient flow through the clinic. Dermatologists reported that the personalised risk information enhanced their confidence in assessing patient risk and recommending tailored surveillance schedules. Most patients reported that the risk assessment and tailored information were a beneficial addition to their care. Among patients whose risk deviated from their expectations, some reported feeling worried, confused or mistrust in the risk information, including those at lower risk who were recommended to decrease surveillance frequency.ConclusionsIt is feasible and acceptable to patients and clinic staff to calculate and deliver personalised melanoma risk information and tailored surveillance as part of routine clinical care within dermatology clinics.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

University of New South Wales

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3