“First” matters: A qualitative examination of a strategy for controlling the agenda when answering questions in the 2016 U.S. republican primary election debates-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

“First” matters: A qualitative examination of a strategy for controlling the agenda when answering questions in the 2016 U.S. republican primary election debates

Published:2018-08-17 Issue:1 Volume:86 Page:23-45
ISSN:0363-7751
Container-title:Communication Monographs
language:en
Short-container-title:Communication Monographs

Author:

Montiegel Kristella¹,Robinson Jeffrey D.²

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sociology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

2. Department of Communication, Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Language and Linguistics,Communication

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03637751.2018.1498978

Reference102 articles.

1. Transitional regularities for ‘casual’ “Okay” usages

2. Disclosing and responding to cancer “fears” during oncology interviews

3. Claiming Insufficient Knowledge

4. Agenda Control in the 1976 Debates: A Content Analysis

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Framing interactivity in complex communication of debate talk show;Language and Dialogue;2024-08-05

2. When a journalist and politician engage in deception detection: Effects of demeanor, refutation, and partisanship in combative media interviews;Communication Monographs;2023-08-22

3. ‘I just need a yes or no’: Managing resistant responses in U.S. Senate hearings;Discourse Studies;2023-04-13

4. Setting a Q-uestionable attribute agenda;The Agenda Setting Journal;2021-12-31

5. Taking a detour before answering the question: Turn-initial okay in second position in English interaction;Language & Communication;2021-01