Prevalence of low back pain and sickness absence: A ``borderline'' study in Norway and Sweden

Author:

Ihlebæk Camilla1,Hansson Tommy H.2,Lærum Even3,Brage Soren4,Eriksen Hege R.5,Holm Sten H.6,Svendsrød Rolf7,Indahl Aage8

Affiliation:

1. Norwegian Back Pain Network, Research Unit, HALOS, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway,

2. Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden

3. Norwegian Back Pain Network, Communication Unit, Ullevål University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

4. Section of Occupational Health and Social Insurance Medicine, Department of General Practice and Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway

5. Norwegian Back Pain Network, Research Unit, HALOS, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, Department of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway

6. Department of Experimental Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden

7. Norwegian Gallup AS, Oslo, Norway

8. Hospital of Rehabilitation, Stavern, Norway

Abstract

Aims: Low back pain (LBP) is a major public health problem in both Norway and Sweden. The aim of the study was to estimate the prevalence of LBP and sickness absence due to LBP in two neighbouring regions in Norway and Sweden. The two areas have similar socioeconomic status, but differ in health benefit systems. Methods: A representative sample of 1,988 adults in Norway and 2,006 in Sweden completed questionnaires concerning LBP during 1999 and 2000. For this study only individuals in part or full time jobs, (n=1,158 in Norway and n=1,129 in Sweden) were included. Results: In Norway the lifetime prevalence was 60.7% and in Sweden 69.6%, the one-year prevalence was 40.5% and 47.2%, and the point prevalence 13.4% and 18.2% respectively. There was a significantly higher risk of reporting LBP in Sweden, even after controlling for gender, age, education, and physical workload. There was no difference in risk of self-certificated short-term sickness absence (1—3 days), but it was a 40% lower risk of sickness absence with medical sickness certification in Sweden compared with Norway. Conclusion: The prevalence of LBP was higher in the Swedish area than in the Norwegian. The risk of self-certificated sickness absence, however, showed no differences and the risk of medically certificated sickness absence was lower in the Swedish area. This contradiction might partly be explained by the economical ``disincentives'' in the Swedish health compensation system.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine

Cited by 55 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3