The design of performance budgeting processes and managerial accountability relationships-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The design of performance budgeting processes and managerial accountability relationships

Published:2016-10-24 Issue:7 Volume:19 Page:954-971
ISSN:1471-9037
Container-title:Public Management Review
language:en
Short-container-title:Public Management Review

Author:

Cuganesan Suresh¹

Affiliation:

1. The University of Sydney Business School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Management Information Systems

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14719037.2016.1243811

Reference39 articles.

1. ANAO (Australian National Audit Office). 2011. “Development and Implementation of Key Performance Indicators to Support the Outcomes and Programs Framework.” Performance Audit Report No. 5 2011-12. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

2. Integrating Performance Information into Legislative Budget Processes

3. Two Concepts of Accountability: Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism

4. Public Accountability

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Individual, organizational, and institutional accountability: a systematic literature review in public administration;Public Management Review;2024-06-23

2. Twenty-five years of accountability research in public administration: Authorship, themes, methods, and future trends;International Review of Administrative Sciences;2023-11-15

3. Performance budgeting in China;Dilemmas in Public Management in Greater China and Australia: Rising Tensions but Common Challenges;2023-07-11

4. Public service management reform: an institutional work and collective framing approach;Public Management Review;2023-05-01

5. Factors influencing trajectories of performance-program budgets: survey in municipalities of the middle Euphrates provinces of Iraq;Vestnik of Astrakhan State Technical University. Series: Economics;2021-12-30