The Big Data Paradox in Clinical Practice-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

登录注册会员服务联系我们

The Big Data Paradox in Clinical Practice

Published:2022-06-08 Issue:7 Volume:40 Page:567-576
ISSN:0735-7907
Container-title:Cancer Investigation
language:en
Short-container-title:Cancer Investigation

Author:

Msaouel Pavlos¹²³^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

2. Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

3. David H. Koch Center for Applied Research of Genitourinary Cancers, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

Funder

Career Development Award from the American Society of Clinical Oncology, a Research Award from KCCure

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology,General Medicine

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/07357907.2022.2084621

Reference49 articles.

1. Statistical paradises and paradoxes in big data (I): Law of large populations, big data paradox, and the 2016 US presidential election

2. The Parable of Google Flu: Traps in Big Data Analysis

3. Unrepresentative big surveys significantly overestimated US vaccine uptake

4. Empirical studies of balance do not justify a requirement for 1,000 patients per trial

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Optimising the use of electronic medical records for large scale research in psychiatry;Translational Psychiatry;2024-06-01

2. To weight or not to weight? The effect of selection bias in 3 large electronic health record-linked biobanks and recommendations for practice;Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association;2024-05-14

3. Exploring the similarities and differences of burn registers globally: Results from a data dictionary comparison study;Burns;2024-05

4. Differential Treatment Effects of Subgroup Analyses in Phase 3 Oncology Trials From 2004 to 2020;JAMA Network Open;2024-03-28

5. To weight or not to weight? Studying the effect of selection bias in three large EHR-linked biobanks;2024-02-13

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线，采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统，可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容，当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种，收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇，并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询！咨询电话：010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号京ICP备18003416号-3