Messing with Merton: The intersection between open science practices and Mertonian values-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Messing with Merton: The intersection between open science practices and Mertonian values

Published:2022-11-06 Issue: Volume: Page:1-28
ISSN:0898-9621
Container-title:Accountability in Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Accountability in Research

Author:

Hosseini Mohammad¹^ORCID,Senabre Hidalgo Enric²^ORCID,Horbach Serge P.J.M.³^ORCID,Güttinger Stephan⁴^ORCID,Penders Bart⁵^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA

2. Dimmons Research Group, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain

3. Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark

4. Department of Sociology, Philosophy and Anthropology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

5. Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Funder

The National Institutes of Health’s National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Education,General Medicine

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/08989621.2022.2141625

Reference108 articles.

1. Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond

2. All European Academies (ALLEA), and European Science Foundation (ESF). 2011. “The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity.” Accessed 25 January 2021. https://www.allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Code_Conduct_ResearchIntegrity.pdf

3. Author response: How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents?

4. Normative orientations of university faculty and doctoral students

5. Extending the Mertonian Norms: Scientists' Subscription to Norms of Research

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Archetypes of Open Science Partnerships: connecting aims and means in open biomedical research collaborations;Humanities and Social Sciences Communications;2024-09-11

2. Diverse sources of normativity in open science and their implications for ethical governance;Royal Society Open Science;2024-07

3. The methods and principles of the natural sciences are not a diet we need to follow: A close look at the terms of the question;Theory & Psychology;2024-06

4. Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review;Research Integrity and Peer Review;2023-05-18

5. Academic free speech or right-wing grievance?;Digital Discovery;2023