Motivations for performing scholarly prepublication peer review: A scoping review-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Motivations for performing scholarly prepublication peer review: A scoping review

Published:2020-09-27 Issue:5 Volume:28 Page:297-329
ISSN:0898-9621
Container-title:Accountability in Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Accountability in Research

Author:

Mahmić-Kaknjo Mersiha¹²^ORCID,Utrobičić Ana³⁴,Marušić Ana³⁵^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Cantonal Hospital, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

3. Cochrane Croatia, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia

4. Central Medical Library, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia

5. Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia

Funder

European Cooperation in Science and Technology

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Education,General Medicine

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/08989621.2020.1822170

Reference54 articles.

1. The F3-index. Valuing reviewers for scholarly journals

2. On interference, collegiality and co-authorship: Peer review of journal articles in management and organization studies

3. Collaboration, T. C. 2011. “Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.” Version 5.1.0[updated March 2011] Accessed 22 June 2020. https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/chapter_9/9_5_2_identifying_and_measuring_heterogeneity.htm

4. The review process in tourism academia: An elaboration of reviewers' extrinsic and intrinsic motivations

5. Reviewers’ Perceptions of the Peer Review Process in Journalism and Mass Communication

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Introducing IJSPP’s First Reviewer Incentive: A Submission-Fee Waiver;International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance;2024-08-01

2. AI and its implications for research in higher education: a critical dialogue;Higher Education Research & Development;2024-03-25

3. Where are the carrots? A proposal to start crediting peer reviewers for their contribution to science;Learned Publishing;2023-12-11

4. Los desafíos de la revisión por pares: cómo garantizar la calidad y transparencia del proceso editorial de las revistas científicas;Anales de Pediatría;2023-07

5. Challenges in peer review: how to guarantee the quality and transparency of the editorial process in scientific journals;Anales de Pediatría (English Edition);2023-07